The Stanford Daily

News





Comments about "Exotic Intensity, or Not?"


<< Back to Exotic Intensity, or Not?

10 Comments on this article:

Report as: spam offensive Priyanka Sharma on 5/21/07 at 1am

I really think the 680 staff put up a great party. I had a fabulous time but did not once feel unsafe or threatened. Way to go!

Report as: spam offensive sophomore who didnt go on 5/21/07 at 1am

absolutely disgusting. absolutely appalling. i made the mistake of going last year. guys all stuffing their underwear with whatever and ugly girls letting it all hang out. have some decency people....

Report as: spam offensive Haha on 5/21/07 at 2am

Sounds like someone doesn't fit in.

Report as: spam offensive HuTow on 5/21/07 at 10am

To Whomever punched my Hoover Tower penile attachment out of drunken anger at Friday's Exotic Erotic:
Chill out! You nearly punched all the way through.
In other news, fun party, plethora of all-too-close sweaty naked men aside.

Report as: spam offensive Ernest on 5/21/07 at 11am

Ah, the brunette I held hands with was the sweetest thing...! But I know, I know... what happens at EE stays at EE... Though, I wish there were a 'Romantic Exotic' afterparty... for us 3 or 4 that actually are into speaking with other people :)
ps. - Note to Priyana (above): whatever is it you deem as an 'ugly girl' does not preclude that people from all walks of life can't have fun, and enjoy themselves, regardless of anybody else's aesthetic disposition. And that includes letting 'it' all hang out, why not? Have you ever gone to a beach in the summertime?
Second, I stuffed my underwear with the finest underwear I have, I pity those who fill it with less tasteful contents.

Report as: spam offensive Censored, huh? on 5/21/07 at 6pm

What happened to the third picture in the article? Too flashy for the OSA? Or did the objects of the photo have second thoughts?

Report as: spam offensive GXM on 5/21/07 at 7pm

Yay! I'm in the pic! it's a good one. :p

Report as: spam offensive K on 5/21/07 at 9pm

re: Censored, huh? The Daily is an independent publication and the administration absolutely does not have control over especially something as minute as which pictures we run. Don't be too quick to call foul play. Judging by how obviously intoxicated the subjects of the removed photo were, I'm guessing one of them had second thoughts.

Report as: spam offensive Anon on 5/21/07 at 11pm

Both members of that picture were part of an athletic team on campus. Likely that is the reason they requested that picture be taken down.

Report as: spam offensive Lolly on 5/22/07 at 12am

best exotic ever! the 680 house must have worked really hard... cause they all looked really hott.
nice picture GXM btw!!!
p.s. that headline doesn't really make sense...




(Comments are meant to provide a constructive way for users to interact online. Please keep discussion civil, and refrain from using profanity, personal attacks, potentially libelous language, or hate speech. The Stanford Daily is not responsible for any content that appears in the comment section of its Web site. The Daily is not responsible for monitoring the board or removing comments that could be in violation of the policy. The editors of the non-profit newspaper support a free exchange of ideas, even if beliefs expressed are controversial, but The Stanford Daily Publishing Corporation claims all rights and sole discretion to delete or not delete any post for any reason at any time. If something is posted in the comment section of the Web site, the expressed view should not be understood as an endorsement by The Daily or any of its agents. All comments must comply with the “Terms and Conditions For Use” as set out in the “About us” section of the Web site, or they may be removed. By posting a comment, you attest that the material is not copyrighted and that you are fully relinquishing all rights of ownership to said content exclusively to The Daily while maintaining full responsibility for what you write.)