The Stanford Daily

Opinions





Comments about "Fish out of Water: Tech, cars and 'us': How I survived my first Crazy Blind Date"


<< Back to Fish out of Water: Tech, cars and 'us': How I survived my first Crazy Blind Date

8 Comments on this article:

Report as: spam offensive chris on 11/13/07 at 4am

Courtney Weaver should be ashamed. Her small amount of self-deprecation in the article doesn't make up for the fact that she wasted the time of someone who she suggests may represent the ultimate in desperation yet who was apparently only looking to meet a new friend/date. Ms. Weaver apparently misled "Mike" into thinking that she, too, was sincerely interested in meeting someone new, when in reality she just wanted some material for her column. Ms. Weaver should have been honest with the guy from the beginning, letting him know her true intentions. That might have livened up their conversation and given the two more to talk about, though I doubt he would have agreed to meet with Weaver after learning that the whole thing was a setup. Heck, more interaction with the guy might have given Weaver more material or inspiration to write an article even slightly entertaining or otherwise worth reading, which this article is not. In the end, though, it's to Ms. Weaver's credit that she didn't try to go for laughs (her column, as usual, is a total bore with no interesting insight or value other than to fill space) by trashing the guy, and she didn't necessarily hold herself up as superior to him or to people who might seek blind dates online. Still, I'm left wondering both why Courtney Weaver was even given this column and what she hopes to accomplish with it.

Report as: spam offensive Not too shabby?! on 11/13/07 at 9pm

I actually really like this column. It brings new and interesting experiences to the Daily. And I especially like this one, because it points out the weakness in Weaver's own strategy. In trying to take the point of view of various demographics, she runs the risk of insulting the genuine feelings of those who are part of that group. Whereas before, it was easy to mock gun-toting Republicans, with this column she runs the risk of insulting people who are really just lonely. And she recognizes that. Kudos, for another great column.

Report as: spam offensive anon on 11/13/07 at 9pm

I agree, great column. Chris, lighten up and go whine somewhere else.

Report as: spam offensive Chris?...more like MIKE! on 11/13/07 at 10pm

I'm sorry she hurt your feelings, man, but its time to move on to your next online-dating-service-assisted outing.

Report as: spam offensive chris on 11/14/07 at 12am

When I was writing my first comment I knew someone was going to say I was Mike.

Anyway, you guys must be friends of the author Courtney Weaver if you can claim that this is a "great" column. Either that or you have really low standards. This one is so BLAH. The lowly interns and kate-o-ind. or whatever are much better.

Report as: spam offensive Jared on 11/15/07 at 9am

Uhm mike you need a life you will never get a piece like courtney

Report as: spam offensive lady on 11/27/07 at 12am

I have actually used crazy blind date before, and am neither desperate or so overly optimistic that I might find love that way. In fact I'm in a lovely relationship, but find it totally entertaining to go on blind dates. I, however, am upfront with people about that before hand. I've also used CL for similar things, spontaneously meeting a new person with no expectations except maybe a good story to tell an old friend the next day, or a new friend to tell an old story too. blind dates don't have to be about romance or desperation, they can just be about having fun and taking a chance.

Report as: spam offensive Elle on 12/28/07 at 10pm

I agree with lady (although I'm not in a relationship). Crazy Blind Date is good if you're just wanting to go out and meet someone new. Maybe the problem lies within those who're taking it all too seriously. I don't expect to meet the love of my life through the site, and yes, I can meet people without it, but CBD just makes things so much more convenient, and in this age, aren't we all about instant gratification?




(Comments are meant to provide a constructive way for users to interact online. Please keep discussion civil, and refrain from using profanity, personal attacks, potentially libelous language, or hate speech. The Stanford Daily is not responsible for any content that appears in the comment section of its Web site. The Daily is not responsible for monitoring the board or removing comments that could be in violation of the policy. The editors of the non-profit newspaper support a free exchange of ideas, even if beliefs expressed are controversial, but The Stanford Daily Publishing Corporation claims all rights and sole discretion to delete or not delete any post for any reason at any time. If something is posted in the comment section of the Web site, the expressed view should not be understood as an endorsement by The Daily or any of its agents. All comments must comply with the “Terms and Conditions For Use” as set out in the “About us” section of the Web site, or they may be removed. By posting a comment, you attest that the material is not copyrighted and that you are fully relinquishing all rights of ownership to said content exclusively to The Daily while maintaining full responsibility for what you write.)